22 April 2010

I both do and don't hope that this exchange defines grad school for me

Innocent youngster: Why did Stupak care so much? I mean, there aren’t even abortion providers in his district.

 

Solid liberal prof, nodding in agreement: For sure, it’s a setback for reproductive rights.

 

Me: But…I’m not saying I buy it, but if you buy the argument that it’s a moral issue, then, you know, consider it by analogy to slavery. Telling someone, “Don’t like slavery? Then don’t have one” doesn’t work, because you don’t want anyone to have slaves.

 

Snotty lobbyist from Citizens Against Government Waste who is incapable of sounding nice: Actually? It had, like, nothing to do with that? It was really funding? For his reelection campaign? He couldn’t afford to lose support from his pro-life donors. We always had him voting for it. We knew he was going to support the bill.

 

Solid liberal prof: Because he said months ago he would? Why didn’t you think the dynamics had changed? As he ratcheted up the rhetoric, he was really boxing himself in.

 

Snotty lobbyist: Well? Yeah, we knew. We just knew. I mean, the pro-life Democrats had to put on a show, but they were going to vote in block because no one wants to be the deciding vote. But, for him? It was really all about the reelection.

 

 

This exchange happened the day before Stupak announced he would not seek reelection.

 

 

 

No comments: